Sunday 18 November 2018
Home      All news      Contact us      English
rappler - 9 days ago

DOJ indicts Rappler Holdings for tax evasion

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted Rappler Holdings Corporation (RHC) for tax evasion and failure to file tax returns, the department said in a statement on Friday, November 9. The DOJ s statement did not indicate the subject amount of tax evasion, but it said that when Rappler issued its Philippine Depositary Receipts (PDRs), it gained close to P162.5 million from the transaction, which it failed to declare in its tax return. The National Prosecution Service (NPS) has found probable cause to indict Rappler Holdings Corporation (RHC), its President Maria Ressa and its independent Certified Public Accountant Noel Baladiang for violation of the National Internal Revenue Code or the tax code, DOJ spokesman Markk Perete said in that statement. Rappler maintains this is a clear form of continuing intimidation and harassment against the company and an attempt to silence reporting that does not please the administration.   The indictment was signed October 2 by Assistant Prosecutor Zenamar Machacon Caparros. A copy of the resolution was not released to the media on Friday. The indictment was made public on the day that Ressa received the 2018 Knight International Journalism Award (November 9, Manila time) in Washington, DC, for Rappler s innovation and exposés on corruption despite the obstacles thrown its way. Rappler lawyers went to the DOJ Friday morning to check on the status of the complaint and were told by the docket office of the department s NPS that no resolution has been forwarded to them.  Yet the DOJ statement on Friday said the resolution was signed as early as October 2, 2018. The case stemmed from the complaint of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) filed in March, accusing RHC of failing to pay P133 million worth of taxes when it issued PDRs. A PDR is a mechanism or financial instrument which a Filipino company can use to obtain funding from foreign investors. Securities tax expert and Rappler legal counsel Francis Lim said on Friday, We are not at all surprised about the decision, considering the track record of how the government has treated Rappler as a result of its independent and fearless reporting on what has been transpiring in the country. He reiterated that Rappler Holdings has not evaded the payment of any tax obligations in relation to its sale of PDRs to two foreign entities in 2015.” Clearly, this case has no legal leg to stand on because it presumes – wrongly – that Rappler is a dealer in securities that profited from a sale. The resolution will have a chilling effect on those who have raised and will raise capital through the issuance of PDRs and is a blow to the development of our already laggard capital markets. We will pursue all legal remedies and we are optimistic that we will prevail in the end,” Lim added. Earlier, Lim said PDRs do not amount to taxable income. Lim also said he cannot figure out how the BIR came up with the P133 million it cited in its complaint, calling the charge a bad precedent. In the one-page statement, the DOJ said: A PDR is a security which grants the holder the right to the delivery or sale of the underlying shares of stock. It derives its value from an underlying asset. As such, its value depends on the value of its underlying asset – which is the shares of stock of a corporation. The DOJ added that Ressa s defense that the non-declaration of such gain was neither intentional nor willful is brushed aside as it would be threshed out during trial. {source} lt;blockquote class= twitter-tweet data-lang= en gt; lt;p lang= en dir= ltr gt;JUST IN: DOJ indicts Rappler for tax evasion lt;a href= https://twitter.com/rapplerdotcom?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw gt;@rapplerdotcom lt;/a gt; lt;a href= https://t.co/Kk6F5D7gVU gt;pic.twitter.com/Kk6F5D7gVU lt;/a gt; lt;/p gt; Lian Buan (@lianbuan) lt;a href= https://twitter.com/lianbuan/status/1060818600095735808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw gt;November 9, 2018 lt;/a gt; lt;/blockquote gt;
lt;script async src= https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js charset= utf-8 gt; lt;/script gt; {/source}   A string of cases A related case is the one that Rappler elevated to the Court of Appeals (CA). Rappler questioned before the CA the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) findings that PDRs amounted to foreign ownership and therefore warrants the revocation of the company s license. The Philippine Constitution requires that Philippine media be 100% Filipino-owned. In June 2018, the CA said that Rappler should be given a curing period. The CA also said in its ruling that the negative foreign control found objectionable by the SEC appears to have been permanently removed when foreign investor Omidyar donated the PDRs to Rappler s Filipino managers.  The ruling allowed Rappler to continue operating. (READ: FAQs: Rappler s SEC case) While Rappler is appealing the part of the CA ruling that upheld the SEC in saying the PDRs amounted to foreign control, Rappler also fought this year at the DOJ a cyberlibel case. That case is still pending. Before Vitaliano Aguirre II left the DOJ as justice secretary, he had also tasked the National Bureau of Investigation to investigate Rappler for possible violations of the anti-dummy law. – Rappler.com

Related news

Latest News
Hashtags:   

indicts

 | 

Rappler

 | 

Holdings

 | 

evasion

 | 
Most Popular (6 hours)

Most Popular (24 hours)

Most Popular (a week)

Sources